User Story: As a freshwater enthusiast, I would like to use the AWC output so that I have less complications with my setup, but I am limited when selecting outputs.
Elaboration: I recently attempted to switch from my own series of advanced generic outputs to using the built in AWC support. Since this is freshwater, my fill source and my ATO source can be the same, and thus I expected to use the same device for the Fill output and the ATO output.
Issue: Selecting the same output for Fill and ATO is not allowed. That leaves me having to pick between using the built in AWC functionality & having no ATO, or going back to my series of depends on & conditions with generic outputs.
Request: Support using the same output for ATO and Fill on an AWC output. That could either be supporting selecting the same device for the 2 outputs or supporting a Boolean switch to set the ATO as fulfilled by the Fill output.
Elaboration: I recently attempted to switch from my own series of advanced generic outputs to using the built in AWC support. Since this is freshwater, my fill source and my ATO source can be the same, and thus I expected to use the same device for the Fill output and the ATO output.
Issue: Selecting the same output for Fill and ATO is not allowed. That leaves me having to pick between using the built in AWC functionality & having no ATO, or going back to my series of depends on & conditions with generic outputs.
Request: Support using the same output for ATO and Fill on an AWC output. That could either be supporting selecting the same device for the 2 outputs or supporting a Boolean switch to set the ATO as fulfilled by the Fill output.
